Friday, October 7, 2016

Reading is the Disciplines: History and Being Critical


Reading is the Disciplines: History and Being Critical 
By Whitney Jean 

It can be challenging for adolescents to interact with written text and reading comprehension in different subject areas and assessments.  For this blog, I choose to focus on history since it is my specialty.

There has been a lot of talk about the importance of literacy and as it relates to history or social science. To understand history, it s important to not only rely on textbooks but primary sources and documents. From my experience, a lot of textbooks can be sugar coated or even misleading. There is even a Texas textbook refers to slaves as “workers”. There are a lot of textbooks that are bias and even untruthful. If a school curriculum makes it mandatory to read or follow a curriculum with those books, it is important to have students compare such text to primary sources that give a more truthful side.

For many years, textbooks have Columbus being the hero but there is another perspective, another story. It will be more beneficial for students to understand primary sources and being able to interpret and interact with them in this case. We can look at diaries or writings that describe the horror Columbus caused. From these primary sources, students can form a better opinion.

In today’s society, it is important for youth to be able to look at situations, analyze them, and form their own opinions. In history when interacting with text we can interpret things of the past and even compare them to events going on in the present. I feel that it is necessary, for the liberation of black and brown minds, that students are able to inform themselves and understand issues around them and critique them. In the reading it explains, “The ability to read historical documents including contemporary explications about societal, economic and political issues provides perhaps the most direct link to literacy as preparation for citizenship, which presupposes an ability to conduct informed debate.” Students should be able to articulate what they are going through or what is going on around them and have a stance.









At Niles North High School we had a class called ALCUSH or American Literature, Composition, and U.S. History. This course was amazing and helped us link literature with the history we were learning at the time. During this class we focused on units about the genocide of indigenous people, slavery, the Civil Rights Movement, Vietnam War, WW I and II, and Chicago history. For this class we rarely relied on textbooks and focused on narratives, observations, literature, and primary sources like speeches and old fliers. This strengthen the knowledge of the content.



In my placement social science has not been introduced yet and even literacy is questionable. But when I teach my first lesson on the election, I will be using readings and speeches of the candidates’ kind of like the reading shows us with Lincoln. I will let students form their own opinions without showing bias, even though it will be tough!  





Question/answer: Ask questions about the reading and provide tentative answers

·      Why is it important to have students look at different sources and not only text books?
·      Given this information on how literacy is used with social studies and history, do you feel that common core is fair in making all social studies standards related to literacy?
·      What would be the benefits?
·      What would be the difficulties?


Reference the standards below:

Key Ideas and Details:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.1
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.2
Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary of the source distinct from prior knowledge or opinions.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.3
Identify key steps in a text's description of a process related to history/social studies (e.g., how a bill becomes law, how interest rates are raised or lowered).
Craft and Structure:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.4
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including vocabulary specific to domains related to history/social studies.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.5
Describe how a text presents information (e.g., sequentially, comparatively, causally).
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.6
Identify aspects of a text that reveal an author's point of view or purpose (e.g., loaded language, inclusion or avoidance of particular facts).
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.7
Integrate visual information (e.g., in charts, graphs, photographs, videos, or maps) with other information in print and digital texts.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.8
Distinguish among fact, opinion, and reasoned judgment in a text.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.9
Analyze the relationship between a primary and secondary source on the same topic.
Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity:

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.10
By the end of grade 8, read and comprehend history/social studies texts in the grades 6-8 text complexity band independently and proficiently.

10 comments:

  1. Hey Whitney,
    Thanks for the thoughtful post! I think it is important for students to look at different sources of text because you want them to read about both sides of the story. Growing up, I only remember learning the "good" side of Columbus. It was not until I went to Niles West that I learned the other side of the story. I also think it is important for the students to compare and contrast the differences in the texts. I think that the common core needs to have separate social studies and history standards because there is more content that does not relate to literacy. However, I do believe that having literacy standards connected to history is key because students interpret texts when it comes to reading about historical events. It will be interesting to see if Common Core ever makes standards for history and social studies.
    Thanks again,
    Tina Skukan

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whitney,
    I myself find more engaged in history when I am shown a primary source. It makes it more real to me than just reading dates ib a text book. Also, it helps paint a picture of the people who lived during that time. I remember reading newspapers from when the Japanese were sent to camps in the US. Our teacher would have us read and analyze the newspaper from various POVs, and it helped me see how bad the US. for unfairly imprisoning people instead of just reading in a book, "During, WWII japanese were sent to camps" because that alone makes it seem 'normal' so yes using various sources makes history more engaging

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is important to have students look at different sources and not only text books because just as adults used to inform us that some sources on the internet could be not real, I feel the same is true today about textbooks. Like the example you mentioned above about the textbook that referred to slaves as "workers", proves as a perfect example. We also see that textbooks often have a very Americanized, patriotic view on American history which can be very misleading.

    I feel that common core takes away some of the personalized aspect of how social studies can be taught and comprehended by making it all from a literacy viewpoint. Personal reflection and opinion are major important aspects of social studies which I would say are a little different in literacy. The benefits would be getting students to analyze events and interpret what it means to them on a student to student basis.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is important to have students look at different sources and not only text books because just as adults used to inform us that some sources on the internet could be not real, I feel the same is true today about textbooks. Like the example you mentioned above about the textbook that referred to slaves as "workers", proves as a perfect example. We also see that textbooks often have a very Americanized, patriotic view on American history which can be very misleading.

    I feel that common core takes away some of the personalized aspect of how social studies can be taught and comprehended by making it all from a literacy viewpoint. Personal reflection and opinion are major important aspects of social studies which I would say are a little different in literacy. The benefits would be getting students to analyze events and interpret what it means to them on a student to student basis.

    ReplyDelete
  5. *applause emoji*
    Whitney I couldn't agree more about the stance of liberation with black and brown folks through the lenses of multiple historical texts and sources. It is so important to not only provide the tools (texts, digital media, etc.) necessary for students to think critically about the cultural implications within history and society today, but we also need to guide and support the learning strategies needed to critique and analyze text works.

    Like you said, history/social studies is a core subject that creates the foundation of liberation and resistance. So, as teachers we need to empower our colored youth to apply themselves into to the world they live in and rebel against the oppressions embedded in institutional systems through the texts we decide to engage them in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. couldnt have said it better myself! it is important to incopearte these literacy styles!Students should be able to relate to what they are learning about!

      Delete
  6. Amazing post! Your first question really stood out to be though. After school how many people pick up a text book? Nobody, I think it is critical to teach students how in interpret other informatory sources! They need to understand what is happening around them and learn and react.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey Whitney,

    To answer your questions, I think the main problem with history textbooks is that they are a watered down version of history. They are constructed to touch on what someone has determined to be the main points in history. Everything is constructed out of a mainstream opinion or story that has been regurgitated for years. Some stories that are known to be misleading and untrue persist simply because that is the way things have always been written. The great thing about history though is that if you teach it in a way that makes it come alive it can be so empowering, especially for students of color. It is so important for us to know our history. Social science isn't really emphasized in school, but I think it is the most important subject, because it teaches you who you are in the world and how you got to where you are.

    I think the standards could be better, but at the same time they do leave a lot of room for doing really critical work within the social science discipline. Primarily the standard that talks about author perspective is really important, because to understand history you must first think about who is telling the story and why. However, there are things that I would want to teach in history that I don't think you can measure. I think historical empathy is essential, but how do you quantify that?...You can't, but how do you truly learn and understand history without it?

    Great post! I see you included my girl Zora :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Zora is my favorite. She talks about intersectionality a lot and her quote is so relevant! It is important to the talk about our experiences and write about them. We can look at these accounts through primary sources and voices of people experiencing certain oppressions

      Delete
  8. Because students can lose their enthusiasm with textbooks. Also like Yvette said, so many history books are so outdated and should be entirely rewritten because they take the perspective of a white man.

    ReplyDelete